Minutes for November 28, 2006
Back to Home Page
DRAFT
Board of Trustees
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
7:00 p.m. – Building D&E
Chairman Harry Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Bailey asked for a moment of silent prayer. Amen
Mr. Bailey led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Ms. McCahan called the roll. All Trustees were present. Mr. Malek was present as counsel.
Mr. Bailey requested approval of minutes in the October 24, 2006 regular portion of that meeting. The Board agreed by consensus to hold the minutes until December 8th.
Mr. Bailey requested approval of the minutes of November 10, 2006. Ms. Donahue made the motion to accept the minutes. Second Mr. Keegan. Mr. Keegan requested the minutes to be amended to reflect that Ms. Weglein had in her thought for the day said, “first of all, I want to congratulate all the Marines coming up this next day, their 231st birthday is being celebrated. And since it is Veterans’ Day . . . . .” The minutes were approved as amended.
Ms. Donahue read the Treasurer’s report. (Exhibit A) There was no discussion. The report was accepted by consensus of the Board.
None at this time.
None at this time.
Mr. Bleau requested Item 8A, the DOR mailing, be tabled until the January 12th workshop. In the interests of full disclosure, Mr. Bailey recognized Mr. Allan. Mr. Allan designed a “boomerang envelope” which is a one page ballot combined with a postage paid envelope. Mr. Allan proposes the ease of the boomerang envelope will encourage residents to return it. The proposed ballot will contain 3 questions: pavers for driveways, steps tied down, and the fence issue. Mr. Allan postulated the Board did not need to hold another workshop; the Board had already discussed the issues in several workshops. Total cost of printing the boomerang ballot is less than a thousand dollars. Mr. Allan said he was elected because he’s an action oriented Trustee and wants to get things done quickly, moving through agenda items, approving things, and moving on.
Mr. Allan made a motion to approve this mailing exactly the way he has done it, with the lawyer review, get it done so it gets into the mail boxes no later than January, and [we] can have the results back on this by February. All of the homeowners are in residence now. I’d like to see us do this now, and that’s the motion I’d like to make.
Mr. Bailey said, “I’m going to table this because I sent out a letter to every Trustee and every . . . . . . . .” Mr. Allan: “I’ve made a motion. Could you ask if there’s a second, please?” Mr. Bailey: “Alright. Someone will second it, and then we’ll vote and see where it goes, alright?”
Ms. Donahue: “I’ll second it”.
Mr. Bleau commented the DOR ballot was mailed earlier this year. The Board has held workshops to hash out issues on the DOR. The last item on the DOR mailing dealt with the way [we] amend the amendments. Mr. Bleau stated the only items that passed are 3(a)3, 3(a)6, and 3(a)16. Mr. Bleau commented the cost of the mailing calls for more items on the ballot than the ones proposed by Mr. Allan.
Ms. McCahan specifically wants to discuss and decide about vinyl covered chain link. It comes in various colors and that behooves the Trustees to be very specific about the colors allowed. Ms. McCahan favors green or white. She acknowledged errors on the previous mailing may have skewed results.
Mr. Bailey said, “I move the question, and we’ll bring it to a vote.”
Mr. Keegan asked, “what does move the question” mean?
Mr. Bailey explained it means move the question on to a vote.
Mr. Allan asked, “We can’t have any discussion?”
Mr. Bailey replied, “No. I’m ending it right now because we’re going to go to a workshop.”
Mr. Allan: “You know, Harry, I really have a couple of things I’d like to say.”
Mr. Bailey: “But I’m going to bring it to a workshop and we can still do it.”
Mr. Allan: “There’s still discussion on the floor and there still hasn’t been a vote on my motion, so you can’t exactly send it to a workshop without a vote on my motion.”
Mr. Bailey: “I need to ask the attorney a question. If we’re in a conversation, and it’s rambling, and in my opinion that’s what we’re starting to do, going over and over and over, why is it I can’t move the question for a vote?”
Mr. Malek: “I believe Mr. Ferris began his comment before you called the question.”
Mr. Bailey: “Alright, Mr. Ferris.”
Mr. Ferris: “I think we should continue the discussion until the discussion is over before we take a vote. I agree with Ms. McCahan and Mr. Bleau with regards to the issue of the fence, which has not been resolved. I don’t know how you could possibly place it on a ballot without resolving the issue first. I do like your idea, Mr. Allan, on that type of envelope, but I’m curious as to the cost of it.”
Mr. Allan: “We can certainly take this to a work shop if that’s what everybody wants to do. My comment is pretty simple. These questions have already been to a workshop. I’m not trying to reinvent the wheel. I’m not creating brand new amendments. These are amendments that have already been agreed to. Amendments that were already included on the ballot except for the last one. I certainly want to highly recommend we don’t go back into the same process of putting 15 ballot amendments [on the ballot] and doing it that way. I don’t think it works, it didn’t work the last time. By tabling this to a workshop in January, by that time we vote on it at the end of January, and by the time it gets to printing it’ll be March, and we’ll lose out on the opportunity of catching people. I’m happy to have brought up a new idea, something I think could be a valid effort on our part. If we put three, or even four, amendments on a ballot like this and get it out there, and have a high rate of success and high return, I think at that point we can certainly consider doing two small mailings and getting 8 amendments passed rather than to try to do 15 all at one time. Thank you very much, I appreciate the opportunity to finish my discussion.”
Ms. Weglein: “Unfortunately the ballots that were prepared last time were not prepared properly. They were mailed out in a disgraceful way. I think your idea is very good, but one thing we keep forgetting is our Hardie board. That has to be decided, whether it’s decided by this Board, or it’s decided by the people out there. But that is a very important item. We have people using it. We aren’t [fining] them, but it is an item that has to be discussed.”
Ms. Weglein concurred with the smaller format. When the whole DOR was sent out “it was a disaster”. Mr. Keegan concurs with the idea of streamlining the mailing, and feels that three or four thousand dollars for just three items is excessive. A workshop would add a few more items for the same amount of money. Mr. Keegan wants more resident input on January 12th. Mr. Bleau moved the question. Mr. Bailey moved on to the vote. Mr. Keegan still wanted to know what “move the question” means because he had never heard it used except in Robert’s Rules. Mr. Bailey said it was designed to cut off a rambling conversation when a conclusion hadn’t been reached. Mr. Keegan asked if it was a rule of this Board? Mr. Bailey acknowledged it did come from Robert’s Rules. Mr. Bleau objected. Moved the question means go to the vote on Mr. Allan’s motion and whoever seconded it. That’s “moving the question”.
Mr. Bailey invited a vote, and asked if Mr. Allan and Ms. Donahue would rescind their motion. Each declined. Mr. Bailey requested the recording secretary to read back the motion. The Board voted by a show of hands. 2 Trustees voted for the direct mailing, 5 voted against. Motion failed.
Ms. McCahan asked to have the DOR mailing part of the January 12th agenda. Ms. Donohue asked if the Board would vote on the mailing at the regular meeting directly after the workshop. Mr. Bailey said yes.
On behalf of the residents of Barefoot Bay, Mr. Ferris thanked Mr. Malek and Mr. Torpy for their assistance in the past. Mr. Ferris proceeded with a fact sheet containing 10 reasons an attorney is not necessary at any of the Board meetings or workshops. [Exhibit B] Mr. Ferris was asked to clarify Item #6 on the list. Mr. Ferris explained copies of the DOR, the Charter, the General Rules Applicable to District Facilities, and a copy of the Sunshine Law are presented to the Board of Trustees because the Board members should be able to read these documents and follow them as stated.
Mr. Ferris referred to the November 10, 2006 meeting minutes on page 11, next to last paragraph. He made a motion that a work shop be scheduled with ARCC, Code Enforcement, Violations Committee and the Board of Trustees to discuss and determine the Deed of Restrictions, the Hardie board, and the lamp post issues. It was seconded by Ms. McCahan. Then Mr. Bailey asked Mr. Torpy to comment on Mr. Ferris’s motion. Mr. Torpy offered that the Violations Committee did not need to be there. Mr. Ferris felt it was unnecessary to have to clarify his motion. Section 12 of the DOR says “Enforcement of the Deed of Restrictions, Article 39a) the Violations Committee to assist in the enforcement of the provisions of this instrument; the Violations Committee shall advise and consult with a designated representative of the Recreation District with respect to apparent or alleged violations of the terms or conditions of this instrument. The Violations Committee shall bring apparent or alleged violations to the attention of the Recreation District, and shall consult with Recreation District’s designated representative as to the appropriate means to correct or remedy such violations. The subsection shall not be deemed to limit the right of the Recreation District to determine whether such a violation exists and the appropriate remedy for any such violation.” Sections B & C have to do with the Violations Committee involvement with the Deed of Restrictions, which is why Mr. Ferris included the Violations Committee to be present at the workshop January 12th.
Ms. McCahan commented her impression of the November 10th meeting was that Mr. Malek commented the Violations Committee didn’t have to be there, not that they couldn’t attend. Mr. Ferris reiterated that the point of the matter is an attorney doesn’t have a voice on any motion made in “this room”. Ms. McCahan commented “I’d have to see the tape.” Mr. Ferris commented the words are “right in front of you”. Ms. McCahan replied, “That’s not verbatim, though.” Mr. Ferris commented on Mr. Malek’s attendance at a Violations Committee meeting while Mr. Bohne, the Violations Committee attorney, was in attendance. Mr. Ferris referred to the November 8, 2006 code Enforcement minutes. Mr. Ferris objects to the comments the attorneys make. Ms. McCahan commented Mr. Malek was in attendance at the Violations Committee meeting because of a possible lawsuit against the District. Mr. Malek said he was there because Mr. Austin asked him to be and the Chairperson approved it. When the case was heard, Mr. Malek exited. Mr. Ferris asked if Mr. Malek had been paid for that meeting. Mr. Malek responded the legal office billed for it, yes. “And that is how he makes his living,” said Ms. McCahan. “Of course he’s paid, folks. When you go paint a house for somebody, you get paid for it! Let’s not go there.”
Mr. Bailey asked if the Board were required to have an attorney at all meetings. Mr. Malek said the legal office looked into that and found nothing that requires the Bay to have an attorney at the meeting. State statute requires the Bay to retain an attorney. Mr. Bailey said the attorney is present at the behest of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Malek commented in the Rules for the Board of Trustees, the agenda order is set and lists an attorney report. Ms. Weglein commented sometimes there are cases coming before the Violations Committee whereby the District will be affected. The Board’s attorney must be at that meeting to protect the District. The Violations Committee attorney is required to be present. Mr. Ferris reiterated the Board is not bound by any law to have an attorney present at any meeting.
Mr. Bailey questioned Item #9 on the “fact sheet” regarding $200,000 in attorney fees in fiscal year 2005/2006. Mr. Bailey postulated the $200,000 looks large as a total, but would look quite justified if it were itemized. Mr. Ferris declined to debate with Mr. Bailey. Mr. Bailey read Mr. Ferris’s suggestion at the bottom of the fact sheet wherein it states a suggestion to make a motion to remove the attorney from all meetings and work shops and said “that makes it point blank.” Mr. Bailey said it is unfair to bring a letter to the meeting and tell the Board “you’ve had time to read it”.
Ms. Daddario commented that Mr. Ferris had not had an opportunity to review the legal invoices, but in many instances Mr. Torpy has not charged for his presence at these meetings.
Ms. McCahan commented general representation $145,804.99 was requests from the Trustees or the Community Manager for this year. The $8,000 is for the employee handbook. Ms. McCahan commented that was an exorbitant amount, and was occasioned by having the handbook returned to the legal office so often over such a long time. It should have been complete six months after it was initiated. Much of the attorneys’ money regards people the Bay is suing. If the Bay is successful in court, the District receives money owed. Mr. Ferris reiterated he had not said anything about litigation costs or court costs. He wants to save Barefoot Bay thousands of dollars in one annual fiscal year by removing attendance of an attorney at a meeting. Mr. Ferris objected to having an attorney chair a workshop and be paid. Ms. Daddario commented Mr. Torpy rarely charges the District for those meetings. She said she has yet to watch a meeting where there has been no need to consult the attorney and ask if we were correctly conducting ourselves. If we want to save some of that $200,000, we as managers should better use the attorneys’ time. Try to find our own best solutions, and only go to them as a last resort.
Mr. Bleau suggested the discussion come to an end. Mr. Ferris should make a motion, or not, and get on with it. Mr. Bleau pointed out discussion comes after a motion is made and seconded, not in the middle of a presentation.
Mr. Ferris made a motion that his presentation be placed on the agenda for the 2nd Friday in December [December 8th]. He said this would give everyone a chance to digest it. Mr. Bleau seconded the motion. Mr. Ferris will call for a vote on the motion, which he will make again, at that meeting. Mr. Malek commented that tabling an item until the next meeting requires only that Mr. Ferris request the item be put on the agenda for the next meeting. Mr. Bleau rescinded his second.
Mr. Keegan proposed that Mr. Malek and Mr. Bohne be allowed to formulate answers to Mr. Ferris’s discussions and ideas. Barefoot Bay has very deep pockets when it comes to lawsuits. Mr. Malek commented if the Board does want answers to the questions, the Board should direct Ms. Daddario to formulate correspondence saying which questions are to be answered.
Mr. Allan commented this is a totally frivolous discussion. We’re all going to agree in the end [we] need to have an attorney at the meetings. Mr. Allan made a motion that we all agree we need to have an attorney at our meetings because when it comes right down to it, we need to have him here for advice, for rules of law, for the matter that a lot of us are neophytes, that we are beginners. Second Mr. Keegan.
Ms. Weglein commented last year there were a lot of frivolous telephone calls. Trustees checking up on other Trustees’ business with the attorney “to the tune of $650 is ridiculous.” There were a lot of calls made by Trustees. Ms. Weglein said she called about the charter and other things that needed to be finished by a deadline. The [former] Community Manager was “calling all the time”. Mr. Malek commented the legal office has been instructed to speak only with the Chairperson, the Community Manager and Mr. Austin. Ms. Weglein commented that was the ruling last year, too, and it never worked. Mr. Bailey commented this time around the Community Manager will notify him of necessary phone calls to the legal office.
Mr. Ferris commented if this motion that is on the floor tonight is voted on and passed, it will make my motion for the one in December kind of frivolous wouldn’t it? Mr. Bailey said in that case it would be moot.
Mr. Bailey asked the recording secretary to read back the motion., which she did.
Mr. Bailey asked for a vote. 5 Trustees voted aye, 4 voted no. Motion carried.
Ms. Daddario presented the Community Manager’s report. [Exhibit C] She urged the community to turn out for the Sunday evening tree lighting celebration at Building A at 6 p.m. There will be refreshments. Before Spring is over, all the shuffleboard courts will have been resurfaced. In the Pool Room, lockers were installed to keep “club play” cue sticks separate from the “general play” cue sticks. The pool tables will be repaired on Saturday.
There must be at least two bids on the tennis courts before Ms. Daddario can bring that to the Board.
Several security companies have sent bids to the District which will be presented to the Board at the December 8th meeting. The funds to pay for security are a result of a two (2) person reduction of staff in Code Enforcement. The cost will be approximately $45,000 a year, and coverage is expected to be 9 p.m. to 5 a.m.
Mr. Malek commented the legal office has received three or four complaints regarding Sunshine Law violations. The legal office forwarded the complaints to the State’s attorney’s office and conducted a lengthy telephone conference with the Assistant State Attorney today. The State’s Attorney will not launch an investigation yet. The Sunshine Law workshop is February 9th, 2007. Mr. Malek urged any member who is not 100% sure of themselves regarding the Sunshine Law to come to the legal office for the free consultation.
Mr. Klosky reminded the Trustees to be at Building A at 5:45 p.m. to pair up with their HOA counterparts on Sunday for the tree lighting. There was a “rehearsal” last Saturday.
Mr. Allan commented the Violations Committee needs an alternate. He urged any resident who desires to fill the position to please write a letter of interest and a “resume” which should be turned in to Ms. Daddario in the Administration office. The Alternate attends Violations Committee meetings on a volunteer basis and “sits out” until a regular member can not attend.
Ms. Weglein commented a resident came to the November 20th ARCC meeting requesting a variance to put a fence up for her husband, who has Alzheimer’s and likes to be outside. The resident told Ms. Weglein her husband had gotten away from home today and was gone for 3 hours until the Sheriff found him and brought him home. Ms. Weglein said the resident agreed to take the fence down when it was no longer needed for her husband. The resident isn’t too happy about chain link. Mr. Bleau suggested Ms. Weglein put her request in the form of a motion.
Ms. Weglein made a motion to grant a variance for a fence at this property, to be taken down at such time it is no longer needed for the current Alzheimer patient. Second Ms. McCahan. Ms. McCahan asked for an exception for a vinyl fence with a gate in it in the name of hardship and economics. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Bleau suggested the resident contact the Community Assistance Fund in case they could assist her in providing the fence. Ms. McCahan asked if the “exceptions” for fences could be put on the DOR workshop agenda. Mr. Malek explained these “exceptions” come under the “non-conforming use” decision the Board established in a previous meeting.
Mr. Keegan commented if the new menus and extended hours in Food and Beverage do not result in a breakeven point, the District may have to resort to price restructuring.
Mr. Bailey commented he is in discussions with the Community Manager about facilities. His report will be ready by January 12th.
Ms. McCahan commented the Shopping Center project is coming along, and furniture in front of the laundry may be replaced. The cement will be pressure washed. Flower boxes were discussed, but there’s a problem with getting water to them. The idea is to make the area more appealing to look at. The newspaper boxes have been moved to the side. Petals and Palms have been doing a great job all over the Bay.
Ms. McCahan reminded speakers they have 3 minutes at the podium. If they require more, the speaker needs to stop when the buzzer goes off, and ask permission to continue. The Board then needs to vote on the extension. Ms. McCahan asked everyone to respect the rule.
John Barry said the charity auction and appraisal raised $3,000 for the Devereaux kids. Mr. Barry was concerned there might be only one meeting devoted to discussion of a management company for Barefoot Bay. Mr. Bailey answered as much time as was needed would be devoted to that question. Mr. Barry was concerned that the discussion had been postponed from January to February. Mr. Barry asked if the audience would be allowed to talk. Mr. Bailey answered the Board would conduct business first and then allow the residents time at the end to talk.
Mr. Allan made a motion that the Board move the workshop for the Community Manager/management company meeting workshop up to the second meeting in January. Second Mr. Bleau.
Mr. Bleau made it clear the second meeting in February was not being changed. The subject will be discussed earlier. Mr. Allan concurred that he wants to get the process started in January. Motion carried. Mr. Ferris voted no.
Loretta Lynch asked about the employee handbook and the workshop on the Sunshine Law. Ms. Daddario answered she was currently reviewing the employee handbook. Ms. Daddario said she had no problem with it, but wants to read “every word of it”. When she is finished, she will distribute it.
Nancy Eisele asked about the Storm water account. It’s the same this month as last month. Ms. Daddario answered the money goes into the General Fund and at the end of the year all monies slated for the Storm water fund are transferred into that account.
Ed Keeley commented he had not received a ballot for the DOR mailing this year. Mr. Keeley urged the Board to make sure they know what they want accomplished before a management company is asked to interview. Mr. Keeley expressed concern about how much more the assessment fee would have to become in order to bring in a management company. He said this was one of the prime issues when the residents agreed to buy the Bay from Avatar. He stated one of the reasons the current form of government wasn’t working lay with the Board of Trustees. Mr. Keeley cited having problems with 3 managers in a row pointed to the idea maybe it wasn’t the fault of the managers. Ms. McCahan commented there have been a lot of residents reporting they didn’t receive the mailing. She said the purpose of the workshop was to clarify what the Board wanted in either a Community Manager or a management company prior to interviews. Mr. Bailey asked Ms. Daddario to find out the best way to make sure mailings get to every resident. Ms. Daddario responded Mr. Allan has an excellent proposal. What needs to happen is to verify the District has everyone’s correct address and the District can do that internally over the next month or so. Mr. Allan commented he had several other things to discuss in the upcoming workshop. He said he was experienced in mass mailing responsibilities and could be of assistance.
Jeanne Osborne commented she did not get her DOR ballot either. She applauded Mr. Allan for researching a more efficient way to accomplish mailings. Ms. Osborne commented the DOR is something we [the residents] have to live with and requested that a mailing contain more than 3 ballot questions. Ms. Osborne was especially concerned that the question be put to a vote regarding how changes to the DOR could be effected more easily in the future. Ms. Osborne commented Code Enforcement was created in 2000 as a legal entity. They are required to retain their own attorney by law. Our attorney cannot serve as their attorney.
Raymond Macht, leaseholder at 2002 Restaurant in the Shopping Center. Mr. Macht said he was informed he cannot park his catering vehicle at the restaurant. Mr. Macht claims he was told previously that residential rules don’t apply to commercial areas. The catering unit is essential to his business. He brings it around only when he has jobs and takes it away between times. When he has “a string of jobs” the unit gets cleaned, loaded, then brought back for cleaning and loaded for the next job. This means the unit might be parked at the restaurant “for a day or two” at a time. Mr. Bailey asked Mr. Macht to provide a schedule to Ms. Daddario detailing when he would need to have the catering trailer at the restaurant.
Ms. McCahan made a motion to provide that Mr. Macht may have his catering trailer at the restaurant the day before a job, and it must be removed the day after. Mr. Macht will provide the Community Manager with a schedule. There was no second.
Mr. Keegan asked if the Board was being requested to over rule the Community Manager’s decision. Ms. Daddario asked if [we] were being asked to allow commercial vehicles to park in the parking lots or is this an exception? Mr. Keegan said this is the Community Manager’s decision; we shouldn’t have to over rule that decision. Mr. Macht said he wasn’t trying to over rule the Community Manager, he just didn’t know where to go. He has a commercial business, with a commercial parking lot, so a commercial vehicle should be allowed. Ms. Daddario responded the parking lot is for the patrons of the stores. Ms. Daddario is not aware of any parking areas for commercial vehicles except Parking Lot A for a fee at the desire of the homeowners who do not wish to have commercial vehicles parked in their community. Ms. Daddario commented the trailer in question is always there; if Mr. Macht were allowed his catering unit, the other tenants would have to be allowed to bring their units there. Mr. Bailey commented this decision was one Ms. Daddario is responsible for, and he urged the Board to leave it there.
Mr. Keegan made a motion that this issue be handled by the Community Manager and her decision stands. There was no second.
Mr. Allan commented what the Board was talking about was taking a gentleman’s business, who is renting from us, and costing him money. Additionally, we are also taking away from people here in the Bay who utilize his catering service. Mr. Allan asked that the Community Manager at least consider the option of allowing Mr. Macht to have his vehicle at the restaurant long enough to load it, take it to the job, bring it back, clean it and take it away. Ms. Daddario said she had no objection to that. She does object to overnight, over week, over month.
Bob Haraz thanked the Board for the canal cleaning. He requested the water level be raised. Mr. Haraz apologized for the Petals and Palms Club this past summer. Many of the members are snow birds, and there was illness among the members who stayed. The plantings got “a little raggedy”. Mr. Haraz invited people to donate an hour a month to Petals and Palms. The club meets the 2nd Wednesday in Building C. Mr. Haraz expressed a desire to have Ms. Daddario become the permanent Community Manager.
Roland Boas commented public meetings require an attorney. He commended Mr. Ferris for trying to lower expenses. If the attorney were eliminated from the meetings, a parliamentarian might become necessary and parliamentarians are really hard to come by. Mr. Ferris responded the public meetings in which he has taken part over the years almost never had an attorney present.
Ms. Weglein commented her belief is the Storm water money is supposed to be put into the Storm water account on a monthly basis. The reason it’s currently not is that the money is being used to pay off the weir loan. Ms. Daddario responded yes, and the other side of the accounting issue is reconcilability. In the future it will go in every month.
Mr. Allan directed a comment to Ms. Daddario. Everybody, for the most part, is glad the tent is gone. At the same time, the tent was voted on by a motion of the Board. Ms. Howard made the motion, and Mr. Keegan seconded it. Thus the Board had made the decision to purchase that tent. “I would ask in the future, prior to you making a decision on your own to nullify a motion that the Board has made, that you simply bring it back to us.” Ms. Daddario responded, “My information was that Mr. Hunt had made the decision [to buy the tent], so that was a mistake on my part. I never would have done that had I known it was voted on by the Board.” Ms. Daddario said it would not have occurred to her to overturn something the Board had done. Mr. Allan thanked Ms. Daddario for the job she is doing. Ms. Daddario added she had made the decision quickly before the District was charged a 15% restocking fee.
Ms. McCahan commented there is a “lot of derelict stuff” going on in front of the Laundromat and convenience store. She asked if any residents noticed anyone drinking from an open container on the premises, dial 911 and report the location. There are no open containers allowed within 1,100 feet of the shopping center building.
Mr. Bailey entertained a motion to adjourn. Mr. Bleau made the motion to adjourn. Second Ms. Donahue. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
PHONE: (772) 664-3141
FAX: (772) 664-1928