Minutes for June 27, 2006
Back to Home Page
DRAFT
Board of Trustees
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
7:00 p.m. – Building D&E
The Barefoot Bay Recreation District held a regular meeting on June 27, 2006 in Building D&E, Barefoot Bay, Florida. Vice- Chairman Harry Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Bailey asked for prayers for our servicemen, their families, and that the troops come home soon safe and sound. Amen
Mr. Bailey led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Ms. McCahan called the roll. Ms. Weglein was not in attendance. Mr. Hunt commented Ms. Weglein “has not called in yet”. Mr. Malek was present as counsel.
Mr. Smith asked if Ms. Weglein was considered “absent” or “excused.” Mr. Bailey explained Ms. Weglein had written a letter stating her wishes. Mr. Bailey asked Ms. McCahan to read Ms. Weglein’s letter. (Exhibit A) Mr. Carillion read his own memorandum to the Board. (Exhibit B)
Mr. Carillion made a motion that telephoning as a method of being present at a Board meeting not be allowed. Second Mr. Keegan.
Mr. Bolon commented that [a few years ago] when he was on vacation, he attended the meeting via telephone hook-up. He said his intention was to be a part of what he had been elected to do. Mr. Bolon commented he had not researched the legal aspect of [it], but felt the Board could not prevent a member from being present by telephone.
Mr. Keegan, quoting from Robert’s Rules of Order, commented [you] may hold a Board meeting by conference call only if [your] bylaws specifically authorize [you] to do so. Mr. Malek commented the Board had elected not to go by Robert’s Rules; the Torpy Group had been asked to write a legal opinion on [this] matter when Ms. McCahan planned to be absent. The legal opinion is that it is alright to appear by telephone. Mr. Smith commented that the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Trustees are not subject to The Torpy Group’s legal opinion; the Trustees wrote the Rules and Regulations the way [they] wanted them, and there is ” no provision in the Rules and Regulations outside of absent or excused.” There is no procedure for a conference call during a Board meeting. Mr. Malek, for the record, respectfully disagreed with Mr. Smith. Mr. Bailey commented if the precedent were set, the District would be paying for some very expensive long-distance telephone calls during Board meetings. Sickness is usually the only reason a Board member may be excused or absent from a meeting. Mr. Malek reiterated his legal opinion. He said it was the Board’s prerogative to make policy against conference calls during meetings, but suggested the Board not make that policy effective “right now.” Mr. Malek commented the discussion might be a “moot point” since the Chairperson had not phoned in “yet”. Mr. Malek recommended, if the Board so desired, to make the policy against telephone conferences, but not to implement it at this meeting. Ms. Howard asked if Ms. Weglein was using her own telephone to initiate the conference call. Mr. Malek stated it was his understanding Ms. Weglein is “calling in” [using her own phone]. Mr. Keegan commented “the meeting has begun. She is either present or absent. Right now she’s absent.” Mr. Bailey commented he would like Mr. Malek’s opinion in order to settle the matter once and for all. Mr. Malek responded that as of this meeting, Ms. Weglein was not present either in person or by phone, so “absent is the proper terminology for where she is right now.” But there is a motion on the floor. The Board either needs to vote on that and to specify whether the Board will accept the call if Ms. Weglein phones in right now – is it from “right now” or from the next meeting on? Mr. Malek said he would not tell the Board what to do, but he requests the Board specify when the restriction begins.
Ms. Donahue commented her understanding from Ms. Weglein’s letter is that Ms. Weglein’s intent was merely to be a part of the Board’s voting. Mr. Smith objected. Mr. Bailey asked Ms. McCahan to poll the trustees regarding the motion on the floor. Mr. Bailey asked that the motion become effective after this meeting.
Mr. Malek requested Mr. Carillion repeat his motion. Mr. Carillion responded [we] should not set a precedent in having telephone conference calls; I am strongly against having it happen tonight. Mr. Keegan concurred. Mr. Malek reiterated that the motion is not allowing trustees to appear by telephone beginning this evening.
Ms. McCahan polled the Trustees.
Mr. Bolon No Mr. Carillion Yes
Ms. Howard No Mr. Smith Yes
Ms. Donahue No Mr. Bailey Yes
Mr. Keegan Yes Ms. McCahan Yes
The motion carried.
Mr. Bolon requested to remove Item 9-E, the Veteran’s Building Site Preference Update, from the agenda. Mr. Keegan commented he preferred to keep the item on the agenda since he had information to present on this item.
Mr. Bailey entertained a motion to accept the minutes of the May 25th workshop meeting. Ms. McCahan made the motion to accept. Second Ms. Donahue. Motion carried. Mr. Carillion abstained as he had not been present at that meeting.
Ms. Donahue read the current Treasurer’s Report. (Exhibit C) Mr. Bailey urged residents who wished to speak on any portion of the budget to remember they are allotted 3 minutes. If they wish additional time, they should plan to speak again in the Question and Remarks portion of the agenda. Ms. McCahan requested corrections in spelling: “Barefoot” and “County”.
Stephen Rice Do the figures regarding Food and beverage include taxes? Mr. Hunt responded that all of the sales taxes the District collects are included on both the revenue and expenditure side, but they are not in Food and Beverage, they are in Administration. Whatever is taken in, is paid out. Mr. Rice asked the District to consider purchasing infrared security cameras. He said he was against bringing in vending machines for lack of someone to fix them. Mr. Carillion asked Mr. Rice to talk with Mr. Hunt or Mr. Geer regarding the security cameras.
Loretta Lynch commented Food and Beverage would do better with better management.
Jeanne Osborne objects to having the only meeting allowing public input to the budget being the same meeting the Trustees will vote on the budget. Ms. Osborne spoke to the issue of which facilities bring in money. The Golf course brings in money, buys its own replacement trees, and foots the bill for other improvements.
Linda Sandt addressed the Veterans’ Building. Mr. Malek asked her to come forward again at the second Question and Remarks portion of the agenda.
Ross Randolph asked if there were a schedule in place for when the 19th Hole would be self-supporting. Mr. Hunt responded there is not a specific schedule. Mr. Hunt commented the District has closed the gap between revenues and expenditures. The District takes into consideration the point at which [you] have to raise prices on the food so much that you lose business. Mr. Hunt feels the District is close to that position. In March [2006} Food and Beverage profited $1,200. This happens in busy months “two or three times a year”. Currently there is no specific timetable.
Roland Boas feels certain figures in the budget are incorrect. He would like to see his own figures presented in the budget. Mr. Hunt responded that he appreciated Mr. Boas for taking the time to review and comment on the figures. However, the total of the two accounts was about $1,200; he said he would be misleading the Board if he told them he could accurately forecast to $1,200 out of a $5 million dollar budget what would be expended.
Mr. Hunt commented the Agenda Memorandum, Subject: Budget Resolution/Decision Junctures, derived from Trustees’ proposed requests, and motions that may have germinated from previous discussions during the budget process. Ms. McCahan commented the audience didn’t need to tell the Trustee’s how to run the meeting; the comments need to be kept to none. Mr. Hunt’s use of the word “cheat sheet” is colloquial slang, and needs no comment from anyone. Ms. McCahan went on to say the Board had asked Mr. Hunt to compile this list for discussion.
Mr. Bolon asked how much money was in the unbudgeted fund balance. Ms. McCahan responded it was about $163,000. Mr. Bolon pointed out that while the District is putting “all this money into the eateries” the ADA bathrooms, handicap doorways, etc., are being neglected. Mr. Bolon suggested tabling the requests in the [agenda memorandum] until the audit was complete and the Board knew exactly how much money it could play with. Mr. Bailey commented the entire Board had asked for the compilation. Mr. Bolon objected to the words “I move” on the list. Mr. Hunt explained the ADA projects are listed on page 16 for the budget year 2006-2007 in the amount of $245,000. Ms. Howard asked if the Board was still operating on Mr. Hunt’s manual report. Mr. Hunt replied affirmatively, saying the $163,000 was “double checked”, and he was comfortable with it. None of the items on the list are a prerequisite for passing the budget.
Ms. McCahan commented she wasn’t too thrilled with having been appointed liaison to the Food and Beverage department because she knew it was “a hotbed”. The bottom line is, there is a refrigerator from someone’s home with the handle off it in the 19th Hole. There is no freezer capacity for the food used in this building. The Panini grill in the Lounge was suggested because having hot food there would sell better. Ms. McCahan explained her list came from discussing improvements with staff. Total for the improvements comes to $15,290.00. Since Ms. McCahan had compiled her list with the same intent the other departments had been asked to compile theirs, she didn’t think there should be any rancor over talking about the things needed for the Food and Beverage Department.
Mr. Hunt commented besides the $454,000 the District has in the bank balance, in the Special Revenue Fund, as of this date the District has not borrowed any money from any other fund to pay for the weir project even though the District expended $440,000. The $454,000 is actually “6 something”. In fact, could be almost $700,000. Mr. Hunt reiterated he was comfortable that the Board could spend the $163,000 if they chose, and the agenda memorandum was simply a list of possible amendments to the budget if the Board so chooses.
Mr. Bolon commented he felt the discussion should have taken place earlier in the budget process. Mr. Bailey commented improving the Lounge and the 19th Hole has been discussed since 2003 and 2004 without resolution. At some point the details have to be brought out and some action taken. Mr. Bailey requested a workshop to “iron these things out”. Mr. Bailey said the Board as a whole needs to take the issues seriously.
Ms. McCahan asked Mr. Bolon if he had his copy of the 2006 Food and Beverage funds request. Then she asked Mr. Bolon if he wanted her to put all of what she is requesting from the leftover funds this year into next year’s budget?? She said she could ask for $30,000 “additional” for the Food and Beverage Department. Mr. Bolon acquiesced the items were needed, “but why weren’t they put in the budget originally, and how come [we’re] getting hit with it a month before the budget is to be passed?” Ms. McCahan commented she’d heard this argument since she’s been here, even when she was just “sitting in the audience”. Mr. Bailey intervened. Ms. McCahan asked Mr. Bolon if he preferred she make a motion to put it [the Food and Beverage request] in the budget.
Mr. Bailey requested a motion to determine whether to table the Food and Beverage issue until a workshop could be scheduled.
Mr. Smith and Ms. Howard simultaneously made the motion. Second Ms. Donahue.
Mr. Bailey Yes Mr. Keegan Yes
Mr. Carillion Yes Ms. McCahan Yes
Ms. Donahue Yes Mr. Smith Yes
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Hunt commented the three items that are required to be addressed [tonight] still up for consideration.
Mr. Bolon asked if the Golf fees increases were figured into the budget. Mr. Hunt responded that it is. If the Board moves to adopt the proposed budget as presented, then those “other two” become a moot point. Mr. Bolon made the motion to adopt the 2006-2007 proposed budget as presented. Second Mr. Keegan.
Mr. Carillion commented on the $10,000 in ARCC fees coming into the budget . Mr. Hunt explained if the Board voted on the motion as Mr. Bolon made it, and it passes, the Board would not have to make the “other two” motions. Proactively, what the Board needs to do is make a motion if [you] don’t want to include one of those two revenue items, the permits or the golf fee increase. Mr. Hunt explained the $10,000 represents $10 per each ARCC permit over the course of a year. If the Board does not want that, the Board should make the motion that says “I move we not institute a permit fee, and balance the budget with unbudgeted fund balance.”
Mr. Bolon moved the question. Ms. McCahan polled the Board.
Mr. Bailey Yes Mr. Keegan Yes
Mr. Carillion Yes Ms. McCahan Yes
Ms. Donahue Yes Mr. Smith Yes
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Bolon made a motion to adopt budget ordinance 2006-02. Second Mr. Keegan. Ms. McCahan read the resolution by title only.
A resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District establishing and adopting a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2006 and ending September 30, 2007; providing for conflicts, providing an effective date.
Mr. Bailey Yes Mr. Keegan Yes
Mr. Carillion Yes Ms. McCahan Yes
Ms. Donahue Yes Mr. Smith Yes
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Bolon asked when the resolution setting the fee would be finished. Mr. Hunt responded “July 27th”.
Joyce Sweeney asked the Board what other approved materials were and who did the approving? She said she thought Barefoot Bay residents lived in an area where everyone was supposed to be in conformity. Mr. Malek explained that the purpose of the language was to allow new technology to be used in Barefoot Bay after it was evaluated for conformity by the ARCC. Ms. Sweeney pointed out the ARCC might allow materials that still wouldn’t have everyone look alike. Ms. Sweeney pointed out that driveway pavers allow grass to grow up between them and become uneven shortly after installation. She said, “why vote” if the Board can come “right behind us” and approve something else anyway? Ms. Sweeney thanked the Board for the golf for the kids. She said the kids are really appreciating it.
Linda Sandt is not in favor of the new veterans’ building. She mentioned that it probably would not conform by not having a carport, patio room, and shed. She is concerned about the costs that may fall to the District.
Mr. Carillion commented the only thing the District is doing is providing the site for the veterans’ building. The veterans are meeting their own expenses and set-up fees. When Ms. Sandt asked if other clubs might enjoy the same privileges, Mr. Carillion said no.
Tom Radford (703 Barefoot Boulevard) asked Mr. Hunt if the flashboards had been removed at the golf course. Mr. Hunt responded he believes the flashboards have been removed. Mr. Radford said the flashboards in the weir “by his house” have not been removed, and they are supposed to be according to Frazier Engineering.
Arlene McGuire commented the land in Barefoot Bay was originally and deliberately set aside for the residents of Barefoot Bay. She objects to special treatment for the veterans and the use of the greenbelt that belongs to all residents.
Elizabeth Showers says she supports veterans, but is ‘totally against this building.”
Mr. Hunt commented Mr. Geer has been in close contact with the pier bidders to provide assistance and explain the bid procedures.
Mr. Hunt had no update on the railway crossing ordinance. Mr. Keegan made a motion, saying “because it could be a potentially life threatening situation to block this crossing, we respectfully request from the County, regarding the railway crossing ordinance, the procedures for implementing the ordinance and enforcing this said ordinance to include: the finding, if any, for any violation of this ordinance. “ Mr. Keegan also wants, in writing, any sanctions the County has in place for any violators of the ordinance. Second Mr. Carillion.
Mr. Malek commented he and Mr. Austin have been working with the County on implementing the ordinance. Mr. Keegan said he still wants it to go forward to the County because of the potential life threatening aspects of the problem. Mr. Keegan feels that if the request is in writing, maybe the county could answer in writing.
Mr. Smith commented the railway crossing ordinance is Homeowners business, not Board of Trustees business. Mr. Bailey commented Ms. Weglein was involved with the railway crossing, and Mr. Bailey would like to save action on a motion for when Ms. Weglein is in attendance. Mr. Bailey asked Mr. Keegan to withdraw his motion. Ms. McCahan commented since the Trustees are “the voice of the Bay” it might carry some weight with the County to ask for a commitment in writing. Ms. McCahan feels an official letter would not step on Ms. Weglein’s toes. Mr. Keegan commented it was Chris Hill’s understanding [Ms. Voltz’s assistant] that Barefoot Bay Code Enforcement would be involved in sanctioning the crossing. Mr. Bailey reiterated his wish that the Board wait until Ms. Weglein returns since she is the designee. Mr. Keegan withdrew his motion and requested Mr. Malek to bring back a report to the next meeting. Mr. Carillion withdrew his second.
Mr. Hunt commented the County building department still has the maintenance building permit application for review.
The bids for the canal cleaning costs will be issued on the 30th.
A resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District providing for a statement of policy requiring strict adherence to the minimum requirements of the Deed of Restrictions of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District; acknowledging authority in the Violations Committee of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District to ensure strict adherence to the minimum requirements of the Deed of Restrictions of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District; providing for appointment of Violations Committee members; providing for term limits of Violations Committee members; providing for removal of Violations Committee members; providing for a Deed of Restrictions staff; acknowledging authority to the Violations Committee to enforce the minimum restrictions of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District; providing for the provisions of the Deed of Restrictions of the Barefoot Bay Recreation District to be enforced by the Violations Committee; acknowledging powers of the Violations Committee; providing for administrative fines, costs of repairs and liens; providing for an appeal process; providing for a process to petition for a reduction of fines; providing for legal counsel to the Violations Committee; providing for conflicts, and providing for an effective date.
Ms. McCahan requested some corrections in the resolution. Mr. Malek confirmed the correct name for the Code Board is “Violations Committee”. The DOR refers to the Violations Committee. Page 3 of 11, Section 3a: Ms. McCahan asked about “enacting” vs. “enforcing”. Mr. Malek commented that technically the administrative staff, according to this document and according to the Deed of Restrictions, observes the violations, brings them to the attention of the Violations Committee, and the Violations Committee enforces staffs’ findings; i.e. orders repairs, sets fines, etc. Mr. Malek clarified the alternates will serve in the absence of the Violations Committee members. On page 4 of 11, D: Ms. McCahan asked if the Violations Committee term limits could be 2 years instead of 3. Mr. Malek commented that was up to the Board of Trustees. Page 4 of 11, E: “In” its own discretion should be changed to “at” its own discretion. Ms. McCahan felt job descriptions for administrative staff should be included in the resolution. Mr. Malek commented that had been specifically left out to allow the Code Enforcement Department to operate smoothly without having to come before the Trustees Board every time a new employee should be hired, or perhaps duties might change. These things need to happen without having to amend the resolution document at every turn. On page 5 of 11, C: “prima facie” evidence. Mr. Malek explained the words mean there is no need to look further than . . . . . . . in this case, the Brevard County appraiser’s records. “No other evidence will be necessary.” On page 7 of 11, Section 9 B: “such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo”. Mr. Malek explained the term means “brand new”. An appeal decision would be made only from the evidence that is in the record. On page 8 of 11, Section 11, legal counsel “when required”. Mr. Malek explained legal counsel is required at every meeting. Workshops and training sessions do not require legal counsel. Page 9 of 11 (b): Ms. McCahan questioned the 45 day time period before cases are turned over to the attorneys’ office. Mr. Malek explained that was the time period agreed upon in the workshop. Section (c): again, this was agreed in the workshop as a means to collect outstanding debts to the District. On page 11 of 11: Ms. McCahan pointed out Ms. Donahue’s name is spelled “Michele”; Mr. Keegan’s name is “John”.
On page 4 of 11, Section 4: Mr. Carillion commented the language in the resolution indicates a department head would be allowed to come directly to the Board of Trustees for authority to hire staff rather than to the Community Manager. Mr. Malek agreed to “tighten up the language” to state more specifically that staffing issues are presented to the Community Manager first.
Mr. Bolon made a motion to adopt Resolution 2006-1. Second Mr. Keegan.
Ms. McCahan asked the Board to consider changing the language of the resolution concerning term limits for the Violations Committee from 3 years to 2 years. Mr. Carillion commented the Trustees terms might one day be 3 years. This would coincide with the Violations Committee. Mr. Bolon concurred the terms should stay at 3 years.
Ms. McCahan moved the question. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Malek commented he would submit a final version of the resolution to Mr. Hunt for signature of the chairperson and each Trustee.
Mr. Smith objected, saying the Board has the right to set policy and make rules. Mr. Bolon reiterated a “rule” would be to require everyone to have their lights lit for safety. Mr. Carillion asked if the Board could make those kinds of rules. Mr. Malek said, “I think that’s what you’re attempting to do right now by amending the DOR.” Ms. McCahan asked if the amendment votes would be counted on the 30th. Mr. Bailey confirmed the date. Mr. Smith commented many snowbirds don’t want their electricity on when they are absent.
Ms. Howard inquired into the status of the investigation into the vandalism of the fountains at the Bay entrance. Mr. Hunt responded the District had filed a report with the Sheriff’s office but so far the District has not received a response.
Mr. Bolon asked Ms. McCahan if there were streetlights at Suntree. Ms. McCahan responded Suntree had streetlights at intersections, and most people put lights in their yards. Mr. Bolon commented his concern is that, as in Suntree, golf carts will be allowed in the Bay. He cited 3 young people in a cart with no lights on it coming around a corner recently. Mr. Bolon feels the yard lights would help illuminate the roadway.
Mr. Hunt commented staff is in the process of retrofitting cameras for Pool 3. Mr. Carillion asked if the District was considering infrared cameras. Mr. Hunt responded the District is presently concerned with wider coverage and inaccessibility to vandals.
There is no new report on the RV storage.
The bid for Shopping Center painting is due June 30th. There have been 4 requests for bid procedures and specifications.
Mr. Hunt had no report on the weir project, and deferred to Mr. Keegan on the Veterans’ building. Ms. McCahan asked if the District had made a formal request, by phone or letter, to [anyone] to look at the weir. Mr. Hunt responded St. John’s Water Management has had the weir plans for 2 or 3 weeks. The District has contacted Bussen and Mayer with regard to a secondary weir check. Mr. Hunt said he was pretty sure St. John’s Water Management would say they don’t do engineering; St. John’s will ascertain that the weir meets their permit requirements. Ms. McCahan asked Mr. Hunt to write a formal letter to Bussen and Mayer stating the District’s request.
Mr. Bolon asked who had submitted the as built form. Mr. Hunt responded, “Frazier Engineering.”
Mr. Keegan commented the Veterans’ Council requested the Trustees provide them with a site for their building. One is at the Veteran’s Way, and one is at the Shopping Center. Mr. Keegan attended their planning meeting. The Veterans propose to bring their plans to the July 25th Board meeting.
Mr. Bailey commented staff has received safety boots, back braces, and shoes.
Ms. Howard commented she had contacted Mary Lynn Meulman at the Board of Elections and learned the most recent Trustee changes had not yet reached the Titusville office. Mr. Hunt responded Mr. Keegan’s information was properly recorded, and promised to follow up. Mr. Bolon said Mary Lynn is Fred Galey’s assistant. Mr. Keegan said he received his proclamation from Mr. Bush. Mr. Carillion commented he phoned the county, and Tallahassee, and the information was present and accounted for. Mr. Bolon commented Daniel Morgan was still listed as the district’s registered agent.
Mr. Carillion requested Mr. Hunt contact the Financial Ethics Board to make sure the financial statement report is in place to avoid a fine.
Mr. Malek commented he met with Ms. Weglein and a representative from Ms. Voltz’s office regarding the charter. The legal office is now working on the non-binding referendum.
Mr. Bolon raised the question of a resident having been restricted from using the facilities. Mr. Hunt responded there were affidavits from three witnesses concerning the incident, and Mr. Hunt will interview those people before making any determination in the case. Mr. Carillion commented the residents who witnessed the incident informed him of the incident. Mr. Malek stated he would review the incident with Mr. Hunt and prepare a report for the Board.
Ms. Howard commented the Peddler was moving out of its building next to the Water and Sewer Department.
Mr. Smith commented each of the board members should have a copy of the Rules and Regulations for Board Members. Mr. Smith feels they are not being followed during meetings. Regarding the veterans building, the site being considered is a memorial park. Mr. Hunt confirmed Mr. Smith’s conversation regarding the memorial park, and commented that no trees will be disturbed.
Elizabeth Showers asked if the District would be renting the Peddler space soon. Mr. Hunt confirmed there is a prospect for the space. The awnings in front of Building A and the Lounge need to be put back up. Ms. Showers objects to the veterans’ building. Ms. Showers asked if the District maintains a handbook describing the employee’s duties. Mr. Hunt responded job descriptions are in effect. Ms. Showers feels maintenance should sweep up the popcorn in the Lounge instead of having the bartenders do it. Mr. Bailey commented the assignment of duties is up to supervisors and Mr. Hunt. The issue should not be brought to a Trustees meeting. Ms. Showers urged the Board to reconsider giving Mr. Hunt his raise.
Susie White commented the Bay really does have a problem with vandalism. The Task Force was effective, and so was the deputy presence. Now that crime is back, Ms. White asked what good was spending money to foil vandalism if the residents don’t have a safe place to live. The Task Force, with Mr. Bolon as liaison, got County support, support from the Press Journal, and from the Trustees. Ms. White wants to see that happen again.
Mr. Hunt, in response to Ms. White’s mention of a “sting operation”, commented the issue is not about ice. It regards the fact that, as affidavits will attest, the resident in question has a complete key ring with master keys to all the District’s buildings.
Ms. Howard asked if the Code Enforcement department had authority to check out the vandalism. Mr. Hunt replied they do not have any police authority.
Arlene McGuire objects to the veterans building.
Stephen Rice commented the price for the A/C at D&E should be $3,700 not $3,200. Mr. Rice said there should be an incentive to turn on lampposts at night. He would like some follow-up when someone tells him “We’ll get back to you.”
Mr. Bailey entertained a motion to adjourn. Mr. Carillion made the motion to adjourn. Second Ms. McCahan. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
PHONE: (772) 664-3141
FAX: (772) 664-1928